OUR DEBATING GROUP.
From a Spiritualist’s point of view what are your views on the Death Penalty?
“There is always the chance that no matter how strong the evidence may be at the time the wrong person could be found guilty. To execute the wrong person is unthinkable”.
“It is the only deterrent that will get through to some people”. “Not for all murders, but some murders are so brutal that the only sentence suitable is the death sentence”.
“I was brought up in a Christian environment where ‘Thou Shalt Not Kill’ was an important part of our belief. That stays with me to this day. Society cannot stoop to the level of the murderer”.
“Each individual case has to be looked upon separately. The Death Penalty should be there for exceptional cases”
“What is an exceptional murder – murder is taking a life and all life is precious”.
“As a Spiritualist, I still believe in ‘A life for a Life’.
“Serial killers should expect nothing more than a one-way ticket to the gallows”.
“Keep society safe by locking them away. Karma will come into force when they move over”.
We have those in our religion that tell us that before we begin this life, we choose all that happened to us. So, does the murder choose to murder, does the victim choose to be murdered? Totally confusing”.
Fast Tracking v Taking Time to Mature.
Some comments from our monthly debating group. None of the comments below are mine – I was chairing.
Plenty of talk about how good mediums were in the past. I don’t rely on talk I rely on the two messages I got from Albert Best. Astonishing details and the energy and nature of this gentle man was something special. I have experienced nothing like it since.
Questions, questions, questions that is all we get from the platforms these days. With some mediums it has become a habit a bad habit, poor tutoring. Their tutors should have sorted that out in development circle long before they set foot on church platform. It is not to say that mediums in the past did not come out with a question, but would soon correct it with ‘Sorry I should not be asking a question’ and then rephrase it.
Mediums nowadays throw a message open instead of going direct to the recipient. Surely those in Spirit know their mother, father husband, wife, son, daughter? I have my own theory about this. The medium puts out information and reaction of some of them facing him show that the message could be for them. I will never accept anything from a medium working in this way. We were a close family and any of those who have gone on before me would let the medium know where to go.
Only the person receiving the message can really know how accurate it is.
How often these days do you hear a medium asking ‘can you take someone with a birthday on a particular month? There will be very few who do not know someone here or in Spirit who has some form of anniversary in all twelve months of the year. I cringe every time I hear this and feel like walking out. When sitting in circle forty years ago if I came out with this I would have been told to go back and ask for some more info connected with this. I put this down to the medium not being given proper training.
Fewer mediums in the past in this area. The same medium could get a booking at our church three or four times a year. Now, no more than two attendances per year. It is great to see new mediums working in their own individual way with Spirit.
‘Individuality’ is a thing of the past. See a new medium and we ‘old uns’ can tell whose circle they have sat in, who’s workshop they have attended. That is copying not blending with their own spirit team.
I can see where you are all coming from, but I prefer the new style of mediumship.
These days name after name are rolledout in quick succession. It is considered a success if you can take the name connected with anyone, if dead or alive. The modern way is to bring in Spirit as if they are on a conveyer belt name and no info.My mother was on a church committee for over thirty years and constantly went out to vet mediums to see if they were ready for our church platform. I shudder to think what she is thinking at the moment. I know there would be more ‘red crosses’ than ‘blue ticks’ against many of today’s mediums. The lure of fame and fortune is too much to resist.
I sat in development circles for eight years before it was suggested that I might be ready to take a service. Then, my bookings for the next six years were two, three, six, six, nine and then 16. I did not take my first workshop until I had been on the platform for ten years. I am not saying that this is a guideline for us all to follow. We all develop at different rates. Today with social network a medium seems to burst onto the scene and is taking workshops from the word ‘go’.
Looking at social media it appears that mediums now have to be comedians as well as having a link with Spirit. They get judged on how many laughs they get.
From what I have seen recently many mediums give us what we want to hear. A nice rosy picture of our loved ones.
In the past I was told my father was a milkman something I could not accept as he was a teacher. Years later at his funeral I was told during the summer break he headed north to let a friend who had a dairy get time off.
Don’t shoot the messenger the medium can only give what is relayed to them.
Why would Spirit change from good accurate information to general stuff?
Could it be all the frequencies around us are jam packed with mobile and wi-fi signals? Correct.